![mediawiki vs dokuwiki mediawiki vs dokuwiki](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/context_images/95/e84b5da80e3b/fulcrum-wiki-alternatives-medium.png)
And the code is it's own wiki markup syntax that isn't used anywhere else so i always had to lookup the correct syntax. But over time i used it less and less because it's interface is rather outdated nowadays, like you write the code then you have to click on the preview button and then go back to correct the mistakes. I have run Mediawiki (which is extremely similar to DokuWiki) for many years. Nice, I'm gonna give it a try in the next few days.TLDR: Definitely wiki.js, Dokuwiki is outdated, haven't tried Bookstack. (01-07-2015, 09:57 PM)krzys_h Wrote: Already installed for testing Maybe the editor itself gives me feeling that something is broken every time I edit random page (01-07-2015, 10:09 PM)krzys_h Wrote: I've just checked, it doesn't do anything like that. This is (apparently) default MediaWiki editor: None of the listed satisfy me sadly, but: (01-07-2015, 10:09 PM)krzys_h Wrote: Please select one you like the look of the most. However, I would feel more comfortable if this was a built-in feature instead of an extension. (01-07-2015, 10:09 PM)krzys_h Wrote: What do you mean by "good navigation"? I think actually MediaWiki has better navigation, e.g. I couldn't find any non-luscious theme for MediaWiki, whereas DokuWiki looks fine by default. (01-07-2015, 10:09 PM)krzys_h Wrote: Find a cool theme? Or make a cool theme in TerranovaTeam colors? We'll se
![mediawiki vs dokuwiki mediawiki vs dokuwiki](https://siegzieht.net/yli/ep1qccJ11ClhdwnR_M9w0wAAAA.jpg)
I've found a bug in quick quote plugin! You can highlight text in one person's post and click quote button next to other post and it'll assume your selected text is from the post you clicked the button on. We have properly configured multilingual MediaWiki (it took me a while to do it the way it's currently done). For me DokuWiki still is just another thing to configure for no reason. Summing up, nothing we couldn't live without. (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: svg editingThat's an interesting thing. (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: tickets systemLike GitHub's issues for a wiki? Not really needed in our case. (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: blogsWe don't need a blog (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: support for mobile devicesMediaWiki also can do that somehow
![mediawiki vs dokuwiki mediawiki vs dokuwiki](https://civihosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/dokuwiki.how_.to_.use_.1-768x368.png)
(01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: abbreviationsMediaWiki probably also has that as an extension, I don't think we need that (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: FAQ tagsOkay, that could be useful (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: quotingIt's not needed, wiki is not a forum We don't want every page to use diffrent styling tags. (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: support for Markdown, Textile, CREOLE, and even BBCodeThat's bad in my opinion. (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: delayed indexingNot really needed
MEDIAWIKI VS DOKUWIKI WINDOWS
(01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: Windows SharesWho would need that? WINDOWS shares? Nope. I know it's definitely possible to force MediaWiki to start the title with a lowercase letter.
![mediawiki vs dokuwiki mediawiki vs dokuwiki](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/howtousetrac-101102093347-phpapp01/95/how-to-use-trac-13-638.jpg)
(01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: CamelCaseI'm sure that's possible somehow. (01-07-2015, 08:59 PM)tomangelo Wrote: Access Control ListWe don't need that